Last summer, 144 senior members of the armed forces, most of them retired, signed a declaration supporting Spanish dictator Francisco Franco and justifying the coup of July 1936.
 The action upset other members of the military who made a public 
declaration expressing their “absolute condemnation” of the dictator. 
“We do not have superior morality, nor do we assert to have any sacred 
historical inheritance. We depend on the national sovereignty that lies 
in the Spanish people,” the group stated.
 
The statement was instigated by retired navy 
captain Arturo Maira, and signed by former members of the Democratic 
Military Union (UMD) as well as nine people on active duty: four 
corporals and four Civil Guard officers. Investigations have been opened
 into all nine and, in at least one case, they have led to disciplinary 
action.
A first corporal is facing up to 30 days in prison for 
allegedly adding a personal contribution to the declaration, in which he
 argued: “Silence also humiliates the victims and turns us into 
accomplices of barbarity and treason.”
The legal officer in charge of reviewing the first 
corporal’s case explains that while “adhering to, or sharing opinions 
about, a declaration on historical and apolitical issues” is protected 
by the sailor’s freedom of speech, the current debate around the exhumation of Franco’s remains
 “is generating a wide and heated political-social debate, with partisan
 participation.” For this reason, the officer believes the sailor “could
 be breaking the duty to political neutrality demanded by the military 
and the impartiality of a public servant.”
The legal officer did not specify whether this corporal’s 
actions qualify as serious misconduct for violating political neutrality
 or a minor misdemeanor for not fully complying with his obligations. 
Indeed, she admitted that the sailor had invoked his right to remain 
silent and has not confirmed whether he actually signed the statement. 
Despite this, the navy has opened disciplinary proceedings against the 
sailor for serious misconduct. If found guilty, he could be placed in 
custody for up to a month and lose his station, according to a precedent
 set by a Supreme Court ruling against then-Lieutenant General Mena, who
 criticized the Statute of Catalan Autonomy in 2006.
The sailor has not confirmed whether he signed the declaration
Mariano Casado, the lawyer representing the first corporal,
 argues that members of the military should not have to remain neutral 
on the historical figure of Franco. In his opinion, “criticizing Franco 
is not the same as intervening in a political debate or taking sides in 
favor of one political party against another, because today in Spain no constitutional party can defend the dictator.”
The declaration signed by the first corporal did not even 
mention the one issue that, according to the legal officer, has been the
 object of political controversy: the exhumation of Franco’s remains.
What’s more, according to Casado, the precedent set by Mena is not relevant given the general threatened a military intervention
 (in other words a coup) if the Catalan Statute overstepped certain 
limits. Mena was sentenced to just eight days of house arrest.
The Defense Ministry has also opened cases into five 
military officers in reserve (retired from active service but still 
subject to disciplinary action) who signed the declaration supporting 
Franco. There is no news that any of them have been disciplined.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
0 comentaris:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada