In honor of the long and brilliant life of Dr. Moisès
Broggi, who passed away today, we're posting the interview that Toni Strubell
did with him in his excellent book, What Catalans Want.
Update: Ara.cat newspaper is
reporting that Dr.
Moisès Broggi was Ernest Hemingway's inspiration for one of the young, brave
Republican doctors at the front in For Whom the Bell Tolls. Hemingway
was impressed by Broggi, a surgeon, who saved the lives of many of the
International Brigades who fought on the Republican side in the Spanish Civil
War. Broggi also pioneered the use of mobile surgery units as well as 24-hour
emergency hospital care.
Dr. Moisès Broggi’s home is a small haven of peace in
a hectic district uphill from the centre of Barcelona. A small gate on a
side-alley off a major avenue leads to narrow steps that transport one into a
quiet garden home, where the 102-year-old doctor lives with his charming wife,
Angelina. Small in stature, but universally admired in Catalonia, he is one of
the last living vestiges of Catalan Republican dignity. Indeed, in 2009, he was
shortlisted for the prestigious ‘Catalan of the Year’ prize granted yearly, on
the basis of a popular vote, by the newspaper El Periódico—though FC
Barcelona’s triumphant coach, Pep Guardiola, eventually carried off the award.
For the press and institutions, Dr. Broggi is a key figure to turn to when
debates and tributes are being planned. In that same year, 2009, he was also
awarded the Catalan Government’s highest distinction.
Dr. Broggi was born in Barcelona in 1908. He studied
medicine at Barcelona University, where he graduated in 1931, the same year
that the ill-fated Spanish Republic was proclaimed. He specialized in a field
that was going to prove vital in the tragic years ahead: surgery. When the
Civil War broke out he had no doubts about taking sides for the Republic, which
had enabled Catalonia to recover part of her political autonomy in 1932. Dr.
Broggi joined up with the International Brigade’s medical team. He was very
active in the creation of mobile operating theatres placed near the trenches.
At the end of the war he initially took up posts at the Vallcarca and Hospital
Clínic hospitals in Barcelona, but his political record soon caught up with him
and he was suspended. He was submitted to the usual reprisals to which most
Republican medical staff were exposed. He was nevertheless able to continue
practicing in different clinics, at a time when doctors were very much in
demand.
After Franco had died, in 1980, Dr. Broggi was elected
president of both the Royal Academy of Medicine in Barcelona and the Commission
on Medical Ethics of the College of Medicine. He was also a founding member of
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, a prestigious
association that won the Nobel Prize in 1985. Similarly, several universities
have conferred upon him Honoris Causa degrees. In 2010, the new public hospital
at Sant Joan Despí—just outside Barcelona—was named Hospital Moisès Broggi, an
honour that greatly satisfied this venerable veteran of Catalan surgery.
Do you think the sacrifice of the International
Brigades in the Civil War has been sufficiently acknowledged by present-day
society?
I’m convinced that their contribution has not been
commemorated enough. Their sacrifice was truly remarkable. All those people who
came here to put their lives in peril for an ideal! At the Battle of the Ebre,
in late 1938, there were still International Brigade volunteers present. It was
extraordinarily memorable and praiseworthy. Not enough has been done to honour
them. This could be put down to the way in which the political transition after
Franco was handled. After Franco’s death, things didn’t change as they should
have done. In many senses Francoism continued to exist, and in many ways it
still does today! There are elements that subsist in the legislation that prove
that the Franco regime is still alive and kicking. I think this has a great
influence on things even today, despite the democratic gloss.
What kind of influence does it have?
I think there are admirers of Franco who still pull
the strings. This effectively prevents Spain enjoying a fuller degree of
democracy. There were a lot of people who, as we say in Catalan, ‘swam between
two waters’, and who still hold office and wield power today. Look at Rodolfo
Martín Villa presiding over Sogecable. Or the late Juan Antonio Samaranch’s
post as Honorary President of the International Olympic Committee.1 Deep down, it’s a disgrace to all
democrats, and won’t look at all good in history books. I reckon a large part
of Spain’s right wing is still Francoist. Their favourite motto is: ‘We were
better off under Franco’.
But lots of members of the Partido Popular say they
have nothing to do with Francoism…
Of course they do. They deny it because they’re
ashamed to admit it. But, deep down, I’m convinced they do. They don’t want to
own up because, as is well known, the crimes committed during the Franco regime
have begun to be publicized worldwide. As time goes on, more and more is known
about the terrible crimes Franco committed. Although their perpetrators remain
unpunished, the regime was morally reprimanded at the European Parliament and
by the United Nations’ Human Rights Council in 2008. All this makes things
increasingly embarrassing for diehards. This is why every attempt has been made
to sweep all these crimes under the carpet.
What is your opinion of Allied non-interventionism
during the Civil War?
That was a disaster for us. The rebellion of the
generals in 1936 brought havoc on our country, and left us without law and
order. At the outbreak of the war, extremists won the day on both sides. And it
was then, thanks to Franco’s coup, that the more radical factions—the FAI2 in Republican areas and the
Falangists in Franco-controlled zones—took over completely. That was disastrous
for us because Franco continued to enjoy the support of Hitler and Mussolini,
whereas the negative image created by the FAI led the democratic nations to abandon
us, hoodwinked as they were by the propaganda put around by the conservative
and Catholic press in Europe.
Do you think the Republican and Catalan governments
could have done more to stop the crimes in the Republican rearguard?
No, I really do not. Our government just didn’t have
the resources to face up to the situation. It had very few military assets, and
it was at the mercy of the anarchists who had hoarded large quantities of arms
during an uprising prior to the Civil War, in October 1934. The economic
situation was also desperate. Unemployment was enormous because work on
building the underground railway in Barcelona had come to an end. Lots of
people had been made redundant. There were a lot of people on the streets, some
of whom were armed and more than willing to kick up trouble. There was no
stopping them when the coup unleashed violence in its worst form.
In 2008, the Consuls-General of France and Germany
publicly apologized for their countries’ part in handing over President
Companys3 to Franco…
Yes. But for some strange reason, the ceremony
conducted at the Generalitat Palace did not get the coverage it deserved. I
know, for example, that the Consuls-General were unwilling to let their
speeches be published. It was as if they had subsequently been put under
pressure to hold back. And that would surely be because the diplomatic corps,
despite accepting the invitation to participate in such a noble act, knew that
influential members of the local establishment are associated—either by family
or ideological connections—with the Fascists who had Companys shot. They weren’t
happy at all about that ceremony. I’d say they had strings pulled to have the
tribute muffled.
What about the position of Madrid with respect to
Companys?
They have never apologized for what the State did.
They have not even annulled the sentence with which Franco sentenced him to
death! Now I believe they have issued the family some kind of ‘good conduct
diploma’, that they were made to apply for at the Ministry of Justice. It’s
humiliating, and quite unlike anything that has happened in other countries that
have overcome dictatorships and civil wars.
Did you ever meet President Companys yourself?
Yes, I did. And I pride myself on being able to say
that I enjoyed a personal friendship with him. I remember we had a meal
together with him in the company of other doctors. He was a most inspiring and
dignified leader. It’s curious, because my mother had a small shop with an
assistant who was an orphan. Her name was Carme Ballester. My mother had taken
her on and treated her like a daughter. And it was that girl who, when she grew
up, became Lluís Companys’ second wife! So I’ve got plenty of memories of him,
all of them positive. Such was the relationship president Companys had with our
family that he entrusted a very delicate matter to my father during the war.
Do you think that the Catalan issue was one of the
reasons Franco declared war?
Yes, I think it was very important. The Republic had
accepted an incipient form of devolution for Catalonia with the 1932 Statute of
Autonomy. Subsequently there were achievements as significant as the creation
of the Autonomous University of Barcelona. These greatly upset the Spanish
right and the military. But the spark that really set the Civil War alight, in
my opinion, was the fact that in 1936 the Republic was considering the economic
question and the need to finance Catalan self-government. That is very often
overlooked. But I do think anti-Catalan feeling was a key issue in the outbreak
of the war. It’s very similar, in that sense, to the current situation, in
which the financial issue is what most seems to infuriate Madrid.
Senator Francesc Ferrer coined the term
‘Catalanophobia’ to refer to the dislike many Spaniards have for things
Catalan. Do you consider the term appropriate?
As I see it, there is outright antagonism between
Catalonia and Spain. That’s nothing new. It has age-old roots. It’s a gut
feeling both for them and for us. The reason is that we are completely
different. We belong to two different nations. They are Spanish and we are
Catalan. The problem is we are completely and utterly subjugated to them. They
take advantage of the power they exert over us. Little by little they are
throttling our economy, and taking advantage of us without showing us the
slightest respect or indeed gratitude for the economic solidarity we show. They
need us for the tax levies they get out of us. But at the same time they
mistreat us. The big change occurring now is that Catalonia no longer needs
Spain.
In most democratic countries the administration goes
to great lengths to curtail inter-ethnic strife and prevent tension between
communities. Is this so between Spain and Catalonia?
For reasons that escape me, the Madrid government
seems to have no interest whatever in improving the relationship between
Catalans and Spaniards. They could do so by encouraging mutual understanding,
and the right of each community to choose the political future that best suits
it. They could strive to get these choices respected. Even the king could do
something about this. But his incapacity or reluctance to do so is more than
our patience can put up with any more. I think the king is anything but
impartial. He has no interest in Catalonia and how Catalans feel. He has just been
to Santiago de Compostela to pray for national unity before the tomb of Saint
James. And that’s no joke! The truth is that we have reached a point at which
the only option left is separation.
At present there is political unrest in Catalonia. Why
is that so, in your opinion?
I believe it is because people have been able to
overcome the fear that memories of the Civil War inspired in them. People do
not remember it so much now. Fear has largely been overcome, even though there
are lots of people who are still unwilling to talk about the past. War is a
very serious matter. Many people cannot forget that the others, the right wing,
have always had the army behind them. And the army is constitutionally primed
to act against us if necessary. In that sense, the situation is not so very
different from that of Yugoslavia in the nineties.
Can the situation in Catalonia be compared with those
in other countries?
The situation we are going through cannot be seen as
something entirely remote for a lot of people in Europe. Before the 1914-18
war, situations like ours today were widespread. There were the Ottoman and the
Austro-Hungarian Empires, whose disappearance after the war enabled the
emergence of a whole range of nations, some of which had lacked freedom for centuries.
Greece and the Balkan countries had been dominated and exploited by the Turks.
Sweden and Norway separated peacefully in 1905. Likewise, the British granted
independence to many nations after World War II, largely without bloodshed. Now
Catalonia needs that same kind of treatment. Like Scotland, Catalonia is
awaiting an opportunity to be free. I really cannot think why it is seen as so
impossible for Catalonia to separate from Spain! Now is the moment to lay our
cards on the table and make our demands as clear as possible. We want to be
free. It’s that simple.
Do you think the international community will
understand that?
The main problem is that no-one seems to know about
us. Nobody knows about our problems. People think we’re just Spaniards with a stupid
tendency to complain about things all the time. I think it would be a very good
idea if we tried to carry on with the excellent work done by people like Pau
Casals, Josep Maria Batista i Roca and Josep Trueta.4 They were able to put across our
case most effectively. I also think tourism should be exploited more in this
sense. People ought to be told who Gaudí really was. Aren’t his buildings the
most visited monuments in Barcelona? When you visit Italy, they tell you all
about Michelangelo and his ideological position. Here it seems to be a taboo to
let anyone know that Gaudí was in favour of Catalan independence or that he was
arrested for speaking in Catalan. Maybe if these things were explained, people
would have more of an insight into what is going on here.
Notes
1.
Rodolfo
Martín Villa, who held various posts under the Franco regime and was Interior
Minister in the transition government of Adolfo Suárez from 1976 to 1979, has
been chairman of Sogecable, one of Spain’s largest pay-TV providers, since
2006; Juan Antonio Samaranch (1920–2010), famous as the President of the
International Olympic Committee from 1980 to 2001, had previously been one of
the leading figures of the Franco regime in Catalonia from the 1950s to the
1970s.
2.
The
Federación Anarquista Ibérica (Iberian Anarchist Federation), a radical and
violent anarchist group linked to the anarchosyndicalist union the CNT before
and during the Civil War.
3.
Lluís
Companys (1882–1940), President of the Catalan Generalitat from 1933 and
throughout the Civil War, went into exile in France at the end of the war. In
August 1940 he was arrested by the German Gestapo with the assistance of the
French Pétain government, and handed over to the Franco regime. He was tried by
court-martial and executed in October 1940.
4.
A reference
to three of the most distinguished Catalan exiles who played prominent roles in
international cultural life after the Civil War: the celebrated cellist Pau
Casals (1876–1973; often known internationally as Pablo, the Spanish form)
worked tirelessly to publicize the cause of Catalonia and democracy from his
exile in France and Puerto Rico; the historian and anthropologist Josep Maria
Batista i Roca (1895–1978) also went into exile and taught for many years at
Cambridge University, founding various institutions to promote awareness of
Catalan culture; and Doctor Josep Trueta (1897–1977), Professor of Orthopaedics
at Oxford from 1949 to 1965 and one of the creators of the Nuffield Orthopaedic
Centre, also published a short book in 1940 on The Spirit of Catalonia.
0 comentaris:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada