2013/05/25

Current financing system of Autonomous Communities of Ordinary Regime


The current financing system starts determining the tax capacity of each territory.  It is determined by the collection of taxes assigned to the Autonomous Communities (AC).  All calculations are done in homogenous terms regarding the normative capacity in order to be able to compare across AC.

Tax capacity, 2010


AC
EUR million
EUR per capita
index
ranking
Madrid
17.057
2.641
133,3
1
Balearic Islands
2.692
2.434
122,9
2
Catalonia
17.629
2.347
118,5
3
Aragon
3.062
2.273
114,8
4
Cantabria
1.337
2.258
114,0
5
Asturias
2.259
2.083
105,2
6
La Rioja
653
2.026
102,3
7
Castile and León
5.133
2.006
101,2
8
Valencia
9.511
1.861
93,9
9
Galicia
5.015
1.793
90,5
10
Castile-La Mancha
3.599
1.715
86,6
11
Murcia
2.433
1.664
84,0
12
Andalusia
13.428
1.604
81,0
13
Extremadura
1.675
1.513
76,4
14
Canary Islands
1.767
834
42,1
15
TOTAL
87.250
1.981
100



Catalonia is 18.5% above the Spanish average.  It is the 3rd AC in tax generation per capita after Madrid and the Balearic Islands.

Step 1: Guarantee Fund for essential public services (GF)


This fund aims to ensure uniform access to the basic services -namely health care, education and social services- to all citizens regardless of their place of residence. Each AC must have the same amount of resources making a similar fiscal effort.


The different sub-funds enclosed in GF are distributed based on the so-called “adjusted population” indicator[1], which accounts for the expenditure needs from each AC.


Resources for this fund:


§  Horizontal fund: 75% of tax revenues assigned to the AC

§  Vertical fund: additional transfer from the central government that is set to evolve in line with the observed growth rate the Central Government's tax revenues[2].

Resources for each AC after the Guarantee Fund


AC
GF allocation
EUR million
Resources
after GF
EUR million
EUR per capita
index
ranking
Aragon
49
3.112
2.310
107,4
1
Castile and León
694
5.827
2.277
105,8
2
Balearic Islands
-190
2.502
2.262
105,1
3
Asturias
168
2.426
2.238
104,0
4
Catalonia
-911
16.717
2.225
103,5
5
Madrid
-2.700
14.358
2.223
103,3
6
Cantabria
-24
1.313
2.217
103,1
7
Galicia
1.153
6.168
2.205
102,5
8
La Rioja
52
705
2.187
101,7
9
Castile-La Mancha
958
4.557
2.172
101,0
10
Extremadura
680
2.354
2.126
98,9
11
Valencia
1.179
10.691
2.091
97,2
12
Murcia
543
2.976
2.036
94,6
13
Andalusia
3.541
16.969
2.027
94,2
14
Canary Islands
2.306
4.073
1.922
89,4
15
TOTAL
7.498
94.748
2.151
100

This partial levelling grant does not modify the AC order set according to its initial tax capacity (fulfilling the ordinality principle) but causes an intense cut in AC’s tax capacity differences. At this point, Catalonia is only 3.5% above the Spanish average in per capita terms.

Step 2: Global Sufficiency Fund (SF)


The main goal of this fund is to guarantee the revised status quo, which are the resources from the previous system plus additional means that include compensations for population growth and other adjustments.


It increases the overall resources to the system and avoids that any AC loses resources as regards the application of the previous system in effect until 2008.


Resources: additional transfer from the Central that is set to evolve in line with the observed growth rate the Central Government's tax revenues


Allocation: Each AC obtains additional resources up to its revised status quo. The allocation is gauged as the difference between the base year financing needs –previous system resources plus new system additional contributions– and the revenue arising from its tax capacity plus transfers from GF.

Resources for each AC after the Sufficiency Fund


AC
SF allocation EUR million
Resources after SF
EUR million
EUR per capita
index
ranking
Cantabria
393
1.705
2.880
129,0
1
La Rioja
171
876
2.719
121,8
2
Extremadura
580
2.934
2.650
118,7
3
Aragon
418
3.530
2.620
117,4
4
Castile and León
863
6.691
2.614
117,1
5
Asturias
299
2.726
2.514
112,6
6
Galicia
770
6.938
2.480
111,1
7
Castile-La Mancha
459
5.016
2.390
107,1
8
Catalonia
-152
16.565
2.205
98,8
9
Andalusia
1.081
18.049
2.156
96,6
10
Madrid
-436
13.922
2.156
96,6
11
Murcia
75
3.051
2.087
93,5
12
Canary Islands
140
4.213
1.989
89,1
13
Valencia
-597
10.094
1.975
88,5
14
Balearic Islands
-472
2.030
1.835
82,2
15
TOTAL
3.593
98.341
2.233
100

Note: To be able to compare across AC, SF resources are adjusted

according to specific powers assumed by certain ACs.


This grant significantly alters the ranking of the AC in relation to their initial position in tax capacity terms.


Catalonia moves from the 3rd to the 9th position in the ranking and falls to 1.2% below the Spanish average.


Unlike the GF grant, SF is not set to evolve in line with adjusted population’s growth, reversing the previous levelling mechanism over time and triggering a significant loss of relative positions.

Step 3: Convergence Funds



It contains 2 funds, the Competitiveness Fund and the Cooperation Fund.


§  Competitiveness Fund: partially compensates those AC with per capita funding (tax revenue + GF + SF) below the average or below their fiscal capacity[3].

The resources are distributed among beneficiary AC according to their adjusted population. However, the total amount of allocated resources to each AC is capped.


§  Cooperation Fund: resources are devoted to those AC with a per capita GDP below 90% of the Spanish average or a population density below 50% of the Spanish average or with low density’s population keeping a population growth below 90% of the Spanish average.


The resources are allocated among beneficiary AC distributing the total endowment on 2/3 according to their per capita GDP and on 1/3 according to their population (regarding the one third sub-fund, no AC may receive more than 40% of this sub-fund).






Autonomous
Community
Cooperation
Fund
M€
Competitiveness
Fund
M€
Convergence
Fund
M€
Andalusia
500
0
500
Aragon
51
0
51
Asturias
145
0
145
Balearic Islands
0
559
559
Canary Islands
115
73
188
Cantabria
0
0
0
Castile and León
338
0
338
Castile-La Mancha
119
0
119
Catalonia
0
863
863
Extremadura
164
0
164
Galicia
380
0
380
La Rioja
12
0
12
Madrid
0
367
367
Murcia
80
62
142
Valencia
0
1.115
1.115
TOTAL
1.905
3.038
4.943

AC final resources


These final resources compound the main available funds to Autonomous governments in order to finance the responsibilities devolved to the AC. These resources are shown according to specific powers assumed by certain ACs to be able to compare across AC.


Autonomous
Community
M€
€/person
index
ranking
Cantabria
1.705
2.880
122,8
1
Extremadura
3.099
2.799
119,4
2
La Rioja
889
2.757
117,6
3
Castile and León
7.028
2.746
117,1
4
Aragon
3.581
2.658
113,4
5
Asturias
2.870
2.647
112,9
6
Galicia
7.318
2.616
111,6
7
Castile-La Mancha
5.135
2.447
104,4
8
Balearic Islands
2.589
2.341
99,8
9
Catalonia
17.428
2.320
98,9
10
Andalusia
18.549
2.216
94,5
11
Madrid
14.289
2.212
94,4
12
Valencia
11.209
2.193
93,5
13
Murcia
3.193
2.184
93,1
14
Canary Islands
4.401
2.077
88,6
15
TOTAL
103.284
2.345
100



Finally, the Convergence funds alter the final relative position placing Catalonia far below from its initial position: Catalonia obtains resources 1.1% below the Spanish average and ranks in the 10th position.

Final resources, real terms (PPP-adjusted) index


Resources are adjusted to reflect regional prices’ differences.


Autonomous
Community
index
ranking
Extremadura
137.5
1
Cantabria
127.2
2
Castile and León
125.0
3
Aragon
118.3
4
Castile-La Mancha
117.1
5
Galicia
115.1
6
Asturias
113.5
7
La Rioja
108.4
8
Canary Islands
104.0
9
Andalusia
97.9
10
Balearic Islands
95.3
11
Murcia
94.3
12
Valencia
93.4
13
Catalonia
91.2
14
Madrid
90.7
15

Note: These are computed using an index of relative consumer prices reported by FUNCAS (Spanish savings Banks Foundation)


Catalonia had the highest prices in 2010; 8.5% above the Spanish average.

In real terms, Catalonia obtains resources 8.8% below the Spanish average and ranks in the 14th position.





Evaluation of the financing system


Catalonia is ranked 3rd in tax capacity; 18.5% above the Spanish average. After the application of the whole financing system funds, Catalonia obtains resources 1.1% below Spanish average and moves to the 10th position. In real terms, these resources fall up to stand 8.8% below the Spanish average and rank in the 14th position. 


In nominal terms, Catalonia loses 7 positions and almost 20 percentage points.

In real terms, Catalonia loses 11 positions and 27 percentage points.


The financing system does not accomplish with the ordinality principle and it is highly arbitrary. Here are a few examples:


§  There are 8 AC that receive more resources than Catalonia despite having a lower tax capacity (generating lower revenue in taxes).


§  There are 3 AC that have a tax capacity below the average that end up with resources above the Spanish average.


§  There are 3 AC that gain resources from the system in the end despite being relatively rich (above average).


§  There are AC with similar initial tax capacity and significant different final resources.

Distribution of taxes


100% transferred taxes to the AC


§  Inheritance and gift tax

§  Wealth tax

§  Property transfer and stamp duty

§  Gambling taxes

§  Tax on electricity

§  Special tax on certain means of transport

§  Tax on hydrocarbon-oil retail sales


They represent the 11.2% of non-financial revenues of Catalan government (2012 Budget).

Partially transferred taxes to the AC


§  50% of personal income tax

§  50% of VAT

§  58% of excise duties on hydrocarbons

§  58% excise duty on manufactured production of alcohol

§  58% excise duty on manufactured production of tobacco


They represent the 63.1% of non-financial revenues of Catalan government (2012 Budget).

Read this article in French






Government of Catalonia
Ministry of Economy and Knowledge



[1] This indicator is gauged as a weighted average of seven variables: population (30%), area (1.8%), dispersion (0.6%), insularity (0.6%), equivalent protected population (38%), population aged 65 years or above (8.5%) and population up to 16 years of age (20.5%).
[2] This growth rate only considers the evolution of the Central Government’s tax revenue from the total revenue raised by the taxes shared with AC.
[3] This differs from tax capacity index. It is gauged as follows:
   where
CFi: AC’s tax resources in normative terms
Pai: AC’s adjusted population
CFt: total tax resources in normative terms
Pat: total adjusted population

Source: Diplocat

0 comentaris:

Publica un comentari a l'entrada