Last summer, 144 senior members of the armed forces, most of them retired, signed a declaration supporting Spanish dictator Francisco Franco and justifying the coup of July 1936.
The action upset other members of the military who made a public
declaration expressing their “absolute condemnation” of the dictator.
“We do not have superior morality, nor do we assert to have any sacred
historical inheritance. We depend on the national sovereignty that lies
in the Spanish people,” the group stated.
The statement was instigated by retired navy
captain Arturo Maira, and signed by former members of the Democratic
Military Union (UMD) as well as nine people on active duty: four
corporals and four Civil Guard officers. Investigations have been opened
into all nine and, in at least one case, they have led to disciplinary
action.
A first corporal is facing up to 30 days in prison for
allegedly adding a personal contribution to the declaration, in which he
argued: “Silence also humiliates the victims and turns us into
accomplices of barbarity and treason.”
The legal officer in charge of reviewing the first
corporal’s case explains that while “adhering to, or sharing opinions
about, a declaration on historical and apolitical issues” is protected
by the sailor’s freedom of speech, the current debate around the exhumation of Franco’s remains
“is generating a wide and heated political-social debate, with partisan
participation.” For this reason, the officer believes the sailor “could
be breaking the duty to political neutrality demanded by the military
and the impartiality of a public servant.”
The legal officer did not specify whether this corporal’s
actions qualify as serious misconduct for violating political neutrality
or a minor misdemeanor for not fully complying with his obligations.
Indeed, she admitted that the sailor had invoked his right to remain
silent and has not confirmed whether he actually signed the statement.
Despite this, the navy has opened disciplinary proceedings against the
sailor for serious misconduct. If found guilty, he could be placed in
custody for up to a month and lose his station, according to a precedent
set by a Supreme Court ruling against then-Lieutenant General Mena, who
criticized the Statute of Catalan Autonomy in 2006.
The sailor has not confirmed whether he signed the declaration
Mariano Casado, the lawyer representing the first corporal,
argues that members of the military should not have to remain neutral
on the historical figure of Franco. In his opinion, “criticizing Franco
is not the same as intervening in a political debate or taking sides in
favor of one political party against another, because today in Spain no constitutional party can defend the dictator.”
The declaration signed by the first corporal did not even
mention the one issue that, according to the legal officer, has been the
object of political controversy: the exhumation of Franco’s remains.
What’s more, according to Casado, the precedent set by Mena is not relevant given the general threatened a military intervention
(in other words a coup) if the Catalan Statute overstepped certain
limits. Mena was sentenced to just eight days of house arrest.
The Defense Ministry has also opened cases into five
military officers in reserve (retired from active service but still
subject to disciplinary action) who signed the declaration supporting
Franco. There is no news that any of them have been disciplined.
0 comentaris:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada